There
seems little doubt the fate of poker machines post 2023 will be an issue that will
get plenty of coverage during the upcoming State election campaign.
Depite
the government assuring the Joint Select Committee into Future Gaming Markets it
would be open to recommendations based on evidence, Premier Stansfield and
Chief Strategist McQuestin had their minds made up well before the Committee
reported. The government arranged for a
Dorothy Dixer on the 11th of September to allow the Treasurer to set
out the government’s policy on gaming. If pokies are banned from communities it
would have a “devastating effect on pubs and clubs” he told parliament.
Rather
than blithely following the dictates of his political overlords the Treasurer should
have read a paper prepared by his own department for the Committee.
A
close analysis of Treasury’s modelling reveals in the case of regional areas beyond
the 50 km reach of casinos where 40% ($42.9 million) of player losses occur,
player losses will reduce by 75% ($31.4 million). There will be some migration
to casinos and substitution with Keno, in total about 25%. Pubs and clubs will
be worse off by $6.4 million, but the $25 million that previously flowed out of
towns to Federal Hotels’ Network Gaming will be free to circulate within
regional towns.
Currently
on average, only 20% of player losses remain with pubs and clubs via net
commissions from Network Gaming. The rest flows out of town to Network Gaming.
It is well beyond the wit of this writer to figure why the government is so willing to accept the dumb proposition that stopping the haemorrhaging of regional towns will have a devastating effect
on those communities. It’s going to be very difficult to convince an electorate
growing weary of political lies.
Regional
pubs and clubs will be worse off by only $6.4 million. This is before any changes to
their business models to attract some of the extra $25 million circulating in
the community rather than being hijacked by Network Gaming.