Monday, 2 November 2026

STT's transition: A further reflection

 

Why Valuing Forests Matters

One of the more curious features of the forestry debate is that many people who would happily support mechanisms such as the Renewable Energy Target become deeply uncomfortable when forests are assigned an economic value.

The objection is understandable. Once forests are given a dollar value, carbon credits become tradeable assets. Tradeable assets invite markets. Markets invite speculators. Before long, the conversation turns to the "financialisation of nature."

Yet that criticism risks missing a much larger problem.

The real danger may not be that forests acquire a financial value.

The real danger may be that they don't.

Sunday, 1 November 2026

STT's transition?

Sustainable Timber Tasmania's 2025/26 Annual Report opens with a confident statement:

"The past year has been one of transition, achievement and continued progress."

On one level, that is undoubtedly true. But the real transition occurring inside STT is not the one most readers will notice. It is not about harvest volumes, export markets, or operational improvements. It is the gradual emergence of a second business model sitting alongside the first, and the financial statements suggest it may ultimately prove more valuable than the traditional one.

To understand why, start with the headline profit figure.

STT reported profit before tax of just $42,000.

That is not a typo.

After managing 821,000 hectares of public land, harvesting and selling nearly $140 million of forest products, operating a large transport and logistics chain, and employing hundreds of people, the residual profit was approximately the price of a modest family car.

In order to achieve its profit, STT recognised:

  • $12 million from the Tasmanian Government for Community Service Obligations;
  • $2.6 million being the unspent portion from previously advanced Commonwealth funding for on-island processing;
  • $416,000 from Australian Carbon Credit Units (ACCUs) issued by the Clean Energy Regulator.

Without those government-derived revenue streams, the reported result would have looked very different.

The annual report therefore raises an obvious question. If a business earns only $42,000 before tax, where is the cash coming from to sustain future obligations?