With five weeks of election campaigning to spread the message, this blog site will assist by posting regular vignettes looking at problems ahead and drilling down into some of the claims made by politicians vying for our vote.
Let’s start
with a snippet from Premier Rockliff’s media statement of 14th
February the day the election was called:
“Tasmania has
come a long way over the last 10 years under majority Liberal Governments
led by Will Hodgman, Peter Gutwein and myself and my team.”
What fairer way is there but to examine that statement using the government's chosen measure of sustainability, the Fiscal Balance.
There is little doubt Tasmania has come
a long way but it is not in the direction the Premier wishes us to believe.
A few additional comments are needed.
·
The
fiscal balance is the government’s chosen metric to measure the sustainability
of government revenue and expenditure as per the Fiscal Strategy revealed in
the 2023/24 State budget. The government’s fiscal strategy aims to achieve break
even over a rolling four year period.
·
The
fiscal balance includes most outlays including spending on infrastructure buildings
and plant. The previously used Net Operating Balance figure was a narrower
profit figure which excluded a lot of capital outlays and was therefore a poor
indicator of budget sustainability.
·
The
2017 fiscal balance excludes the $730 million of Mersey money received in that
year. As is it drawn down and spent in each of the following 10 years as
intended it gets included each year as revenue. The year 2026/27 will be the
final drawdown year.
·
The
2024 fiscal balance figure is from the 2023/24 Revised Estimates Report issued
on 14th February 2024.
The chart highlights the budget
crisis awaiting the next government. How will break-even be achieved by
2032/33?
Tomorrow’s post will take a closer
look at debt servicing costs and declining operating outlays.
No comments:
Post a Comment