I’ve
never been a fan of MISs, initially because I’ve never seen any investor make a
respectable return, but in the last few years because of the associated
negative impact on our community. After considerable reflection I think the
current proposed arrangements announced at budget time give us a chance to move
on.
Saturday, 27 May 2006
Wednesday, 24 May 2006
Consultation on taxation of plantation forestry
I am writing in response to the invitation
to comment on the proposed forestry arrangements attached to the press release
of the Assistant Treasurer on 9thMay 2006. (http://archive.treasury.gov.au/contentitem.asp?NavId=037&ContentID=1106
reproduced below).
It’s a little disappointing that the
Government didn’t release a copy of the review submitted to Government and
referred to in the Minister’s press release. It would make the whole review
process a little more transparent if we could see a copy of the review
findings. The review was not simply about MIS schemes, it was supposed to cover
much wider issues including whether the current tax regime impeded longer
rotation sawlog crops. What happened to that part of the review? Or is it
covered in the proposed arrangement to develop standards for best practice in
forestry, regional planning, land use and natural resource planning? Sounds
awfully like a motherhood statement. One can only agree that best practice is a
good idea, but are sawlog crops going to be encouraged or will they just have
to take pot luck behind the short term aspirations of most MIS plantation
investors and hell, why not just let the market sort it out. Maybe that is the
best solution, so long as MIS investors aren’t provided with too many tax
breaks unavailable to others.
Friday, 19 August 2005
The land grab
As you probably know Great Southern Plantations Limited have
now joined the land grab by forest operations companies in Tasmania and are now
paying $5000 per hectare. Only the prime cropping and dairying properties are
outside their grasp at this stage. What happens when milk prices take a dive
and/or vegetable growers suffer another blow before they have a chance to get
off the canvas? It may be too late to act at that stage.
Thursday, 2 June 2005
Taxation of plantation forestry
The following is a response to the public invitation to make a
submission to the Review of the Taxation of Plantation Forestry. http://archive.treasury.gov.au/contentitem.asp?NavId=037&ContentID=997
It is not
intended to be an exhaustive treatise, rather some comments from one who is
interested in economic policy issues, is a tax practitioner and who resides in
an area that has experienced the impact of tree plantations in recent years.
References to the 1936 Act and the 1997 Act are obviously references to the
Income tax Assessment Acts of those particular years.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)