There
was disturbing unreality about Great Southern’s Mr Ikin reply (Your Say January
30th) to my letter on land tax in general and GSL’s Temma property
in particular.
Mr
Ikin is still reading from an old copy of GSL’s psalm book.
GSL
reported on their website in October 2008 that “extensive areas of this
plantation have failed and the majority of the failed areas are yet to be
replanted……..approximately 36 hectares of this area will not be replanted.”
This
differs from Mr Ikin’s assertion that only 14 hectares failed and it has all
been replanted.
GSL
has also allowed its cattle to graze the property inflicting great damage to
the seedlings already battling to survive adverse conditions.
The
business of tree growing is being carried on at Temma by 2,400 Woodlot owners.
Has
GSL informed them that according to the ATO Ruling which governs MIS schemes
that “…. in the event of partial or total destruction of an investor's leased area,
the investor's share of gross proceeds from the sale of the pooled timber would
reflect the investor's reduced holdings “?
There
are some investors whose Woodlots have failed completely. Other Woodlots have
suffered partial destruction. GSL are keen to suppress the truth.
If
the ATO were to deny deductions for MIS investors on the basis that GSL hadn’t
complied with all the constituent agreements entered into with investors and
OK’d by the ATO, then all hell would break loose.
Not
to mention the State Revenue Office determining that there is no reasonable
expectation of profit at Temma, hence the primary producer land tax exemption
does not apply - unless Mr Llewellyn turns a blind eye to their Private Timber
Reserve application.
Mr
Ikin is keen to point to the achievement of GSL planting 10,000 hectares of
plantations in Tasmania over the last 3 years.
That’s
a tax subsidy of $40m.
Few
farmers of my acquaintance regard this as money well spent. Just another
example of the excesses of the last few years.
(Published
in Tasmanian Country 6th February 2009)
No comments:
Post a Comment