The
political and media cycle ignores the Treasurer’s Annual Financial Report (TAFR)
tabled in October each year. Whereas the Budget contains Estimated Outcomes for
the almost completed year, the TAFR contains the actuals for both the General
Government (GG) and the Total State Sector (TSS) which includes the GG plus all
wholly owned subsidiaries – the Government Business Enterprises (GBEs) and
State Owned Corporations (SOCs).
The
TAFR is the equivalent of a listed company’s Annual Report which at least is
scrutinised by shareholders at an AGM. No such attention is given to the TAFR
which is a pity because it a comprehensive outline of the State’s situation
based on actuals, free of the hype and nonsense that accompanies Budget papers.
Whilst
spasmodic attention is given to GBEs and SOCs, there is a noticeable lack of understanding
of the financial role these entities play as part of the TSS and their life
saving contribution to their parent company, the GG.
The
aim of this and the next few posts is to have a closer look at the Balance
Sheets for both GG and TSS....... the statement of assets and liabilities for both...... and try to explain the important bits........ cash,
loans, net debt and net financial liabilities and the fiscal strategy measures
that relate to the balance sheet.
After all accounting is just a series of plusses and minuses.
After all accounting is just a series of plusses and minuses.
To
pick up from the detailed cash flow analysis of the State (HERE)the starting point
is the GG’s cash balance.
This
balance increasingly comprises unspent specific purpose grants, mainly capital grants,
from the Australian Government.
(In order to make the figures comparable the proceeds of the overnight loan of $650 million at 30th June 2012 are excluded -- more about this below)
(In order to make the figures comparable the proceeds of the overnight loan of $650 million at 30th June 2012 are excluded -- more about this below)
The
red bits are Australian Government grants paid in advance (RHH and Railyard
funding for example). Without them our cash to spend as we choose, the blue
bits, is only enough for 3 weeks wages.
The
State Government has long been in the habit of appropriating more than the available
cash to meet its spending commitments.
From
an accounting viewpoint the difference between unspent appropriations and
unspent cash, the amount ‘internally borrowed’, or IOUs, were recorded in an
account titled the Temporary Debt Repayment Account (TDRA).
Most
of the amounts borrowed were from the Superannuation Provision Account (SPA),
the amounts appropriated as part of the plan to extinguish the unfunded
superannuation liability by 2035.
In
most years there was insufficient in the SPA account so amount were borrowed
from other accounts.
The
columns represent the amount of cash that should have been on hand, the unspent
appropriations. The blue bits are the actual cash on hand, the red bits the amount
borrowed from the SPA and the green bits the amounts borrowed from other
deposit accounts.
In
only 2 years 2008 and 2009, was there any cash backing for the SPA. This was as
a result of the cash injection of $300 million following the sale of Hobart
Airport in January 2008. In every other year every last $ of SPA amounts were
internally borrowed and spent.
It must be emphasised that there was never any cash set aside to eventually extinguish the unfunded superannuation liability. it was only ever a notional figure. The Opposition are inclined to say the Government has spent the amounts set aside for a rainy day but the truth of the matter is it was never actually there in the first place.
The SPA never had any cash backing thanks to all the internal borrowings. It was little more than a charade
It must be emphasised that there was never any cash set aside to eventually extinguish the unfunded superannuation liability. it was only ever a notional figure. The Opposition are inclined to say the Government has spent the amounts set aside for a rainy day but the truth of the matter is it was never actually there in the first place.
The SPA never had any cash backing thanks to all the internal borrowings. It was little more than a charade
With
the advent of the GFC and David Bartlett obtaining the keys to the vault things
worsened and soon large amounts were borrowed from other deposit accounts.
In
the last budget it was decided to tear up the SPA IOUs as the amounts were never
going to be repaid. This had the effect of reducing the TDRA by the amount of
the SPA balance, which still left $650 million in IOUs at 30th June
2012.
In
earlier years the IOUs were only 10% to 20% of account balances, and it was
thus a sensible use of funds to internally borrow rather than borrow via
Tascorp.
But
by 2012 the IOUs represented 50% of account balances (quite apart from the SPA
account which was all borrowed), and matters were getting out of hand.
Rather
than continuing with the TDRA the Government decided at 30th June
2012 to organise an overnight loan of $650 million (from Tascorp the State
Government finance arm) to repay the amount internally borrowed from other
deposit accounts.
The
next day the loan was discharged, again using amounts internally borrowed.
On each future balance date the Government will organise an overnight loan to repay any internal borrowings.
On each future balance date the Government will organise an overnight loan to repay any internal borrowings.
The
overnight loan/deposit repayment has the effect of boosting loans and cash on
hand by similar amounts. It’s just a housekeeping exercise. There is no change
in net debt.
The
Balance Sheet (or statement of Financial Position as it is sometimes called)
reflects the situation.
Without
the overnight loan of $650 million, borrowings would have been $246 million and
cash and deposits $602 million.
Most of the borrowings relate to a long term debt in respect of housing funds borrowed from the Australian Government.
Most of the borrowings relate to a long term debt in respect of housing funds borrowed from the Australian Government.
Net
debt is narrowly defined to include cash, deposits and investments less
borrowings. This can be seen below.
Net
debt is $1252 million plus $52 million less $896 million which equals $408
million. This is a positive figure (we're still in the black!) but is described with a double negative. The
State’s net debt at 30th June 2012 was a negative $408 million.
In
future posts we will return to the measurement of net debt and also the broader
measure of net financial liabilities for both GG and TSS, but first the next post will introduce readers to the overall balance sheets for both the GG and the TSS.
It is such a brillient article.I've learned something new coming from you and I agree with that in your details mentioned.Excellent
ReplyDeleteAli mudeen
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete