|
|
Gay is the former chairman and managing director of
failed Tasmanian timber company Gunns Limited. His cavalier disregard for conventions
and processes culminated with the insider trading charge; he changed his plea
to guilty at the 11th hour and admitted he sold 3.4 million Gunns shares based
on inside information which he ought to have known would affect the share
price. Gunns, once a top 100 ASX company, is the highest profile insider trader
snared by the Australian Securities and Investments Corporation. And it’s not
as if Gay was a back-office clerk.
(posted on Crikey)
It's worth noting that Gay did escape a
prison term this morning. The judge told the court the offending was
not in the serious category of insider trading. The judge found Gay had been
motivated to sell up shares because of a cancer diagnosis more than the receipt
of sensitive financial information.
So what went wrong for Gay? Gunns, established in
1875, was a proud Tasmanian native timber sawmiller. It became a publicly
listed company in 1986 with Gay as managing director and a board member. The
appointment of former Tasmanian premier Robin Gray to the board in 1996
strengthened the links between Gunns and Tas Inc. Gay may have stretched
orthodox corporate governance arrangements when as CEO he was appointed as
chairman of the board in 2002. Gay and Gray became a formidable team, a duo of
corporate hard-heads with impeccable political connections.
At the turn of the century Gunns was still a small
company. In 1998 the turnover was $97 million and after-tax profits $3 million.
Profits peaked in 2004 at $105 million on turnover of $674 million. Gunns
joined the ASX100 and Gay was the darling of institutional investors, providing
capital growth and healthy dividends return, at first from woodchipping but
increasingly from managed investment schemes (MIS).
Under Gay’s chairmanship, native forest
woodchipping and MIS contributed over 90% of Gunns’ profits and cash flow. In
profit terms woodchipping peaked in 2004 and MIS in 2006.
Gunns’ political connections reaped rewards as the
state-owned Forestry Tasmania allowed what some saw as the overcutting of State
Forests for inadequate consideration. Gunns’ pulp mill plans were hatched with
then-premier Paul Lennon of the ALP, and eventually required a special act of
Parliament to bypass planning procedures when Gunns was found to be critically
non-compliant. Dotting the "i"s and crossing the "t"s never
seemed to be Gay’s strongest suit.
Gunns was an old fashioned conglomerate. Apart from
forest assets, it owned hardware stores, a wine business, pubs, managed grape
and walnut schemes, a heritage property and a building operation.
As soon as the act to facilitate the pulp mill been
arranged, Gunns acquired Auspine, a South Australian-based softwood business
with Tasmanian assets. Over $600 million of assets were added to the balance
sheet. Gunns was now Australia’s largest hardwood and softwood company -- and
the most indebted. At June 2008, bank borrowings were $1,058 million. At a time
when operating cash flows were declining and assets ageing, funds to build a
pulp mill had to be borrowed. Did Gay think he was invincible?
Gunns raised $333 million from institutional
investors in September 2008 before other MIS companies hit the wall. But it
only raised $1.3 million from retail investors when the aim was $130 million;
the shortfall necessitated the sale of recently acquired softwood plantations.
Debt fell to about $650 million where it remained until the end.
A year later Gunns raised another $145 million from
shareholders. The ink was barely dry on the new share certificates in October
2009 when Gay received an internal report outlining Gunns' trading
difficulties. He later disposed of 3.4 million Gunns shares. Two months later,
the half-yearly report confirmed the slippery slope with a 98% reduction in
profits. Institutional investors and bankers, Gay’s long-time loyal backers,
were concerned. Gay’s days were numbered. A new CEO was installed but it was
like lipstick on a pig. Pretending that it was searching for a social license
to build a pulp mill, the reality was exiting native forests and selling assets
to reduce debt was the only way to avoid insolvent trading.
Gunns was like an old log truck with bald tyres,
laden with debt, careering out of control, trying the cut corners, seemingly
oblivious to a nearby cliff. Gay ought to have been aware that trouble lay
ahead.
Along the way Gunns managed to outsource the
financing of plantations to MIS investors, and harvesting and freight
operations to contractors, shifting risks to others whilst maintaining control.
This meant Gunns had plenty of cash flow during the good times to take over and
hollow out the Tasmanian forest industry. Outsourcing reflects an extension of
moral hazard where governments are expected to contribute when things go wrong.
Contractors have been assisted. Funds are also needed by FT, now a corporate
cripple needing a permanent government lifeline.
Many blame the Greens for Gunns’ failure. Apart
from exogenous factors, I argue much of the blame should lie with Gay.
Vanishing MIS revenue was not caused by the Greens. MIS legacy costs (and the
thousands of leases to MIS growers which prevented Gunns from obtaining value
for its plantation land) pushed Gunns over the edge.
Initially a saviour, MIS became a strangler. The
decline in native forest woodchipping had been occurring since 2004. All the
king’s horses and all the king’s men couldn't put the forest industry back
together again. Gay had a role to play in that legacy.
Some are surprised that, given the facts of Gay's
case, he has not received some kind of a jail term (the maximum sentence is
five years). A monetary penalty is just another cost to do business.
Gay’s mentor, former Gunns’ chairman Edmund Rouse,
spent time in the minimum-security facility Hayes Prison Farm for attempting to
bribe an ALP member to cross the floor in 1989, following an election that
produced a hung parliament when Robin Gray was Liberal leader.
Gay's sentencing today means little will change. It
will signify the end of a chapter, not the end of an era. The saddest thing
about the whole Gay saga is there have been very few mea culpas and scant
evidence that attitudes and processes have changed much.
Thank you John Lawrence. Your article is the best I've seen on this matter. It provides the world with the necessary background for understanding how Tasmanians view this man, his actions and his crime.
ReplyDeleteGood article John. I always felt Gay was implicated in the 1989 bribery attempt, so it was hard to swallow him being described by the judge this week as an "exemplary character" or some such.
ReplyDelete