The
almost daily reports about falling iron ore prices and the chatter about the
effects on junior miners has shone the spotlight on Shree Minerals’ Nelson Bay
River iron ore mine on Tasmania’s West Coast, as it battles to stay afloat.
Trying
to understand what’s happening is best with knowledge of Shree’s recent history.
Pre listing activities.
Shree
started trading in 2008.
Punters
were invited to open their wallets when Shree sought listing on the ASX.
Before
listing in February 2010 principals and close associates arranged 70 million shares
to themselves in consideration for:
· a few
mining leases with some potential previously granted at minimal cost, plus
· net subscriptions of $1.4 million cash.
The
lads who had only outlaid cash of 2 cents per share for almost 70 million shares
then invited punters to further fund the expected windfall.
Punters in their enthusiasm oversubscribed the Initial Public Offering (IPO)
and took up 17 million shares at 20 cents a pop, a total of $3.5 million.
70% of the cash for a 20% interest.
Small
speculative miners work that way. They depend on gamblers. Banks aren’t
interested.
Post listing funding
As
is common with most small exploration companies, subscribing for shares
entitles holders to free options, in this case, buy two shares and get one
option free.
Converting
options may be attractive if the market price exceeds the option exercise price
and/or if there aren’t enough shares for sale on the market.
Converting
options raised another $1.4 million in 2011.
Once
mining started and more working capital was needed in December 2013, two
private placements of new shares at 16 cents raised another $4 million. Private
placements without shareholder approval are limited to protect existing shareholders’
interests being flooded and devalued as a consequence. The second placement
required shareholder approval. Not that that was a problem as the promoters and
their mates had control. In any event there was no alternative.
Raising
money by small miners is always an expensive gambit. It has cost Shree $600,000
to raise about $10 million in various tranches from the IPO to the private
placements.
The
other source of working capital via an off-take and funding arrangement
negotiated in May 2013 with Frost Global, a Singapore based commodity trader.
The deal was that funding of up to US$4 million by way of an advance towards
the supply of iron ore would be clawed back at the rate of US$500,000 from each
of the first 8 shipments of ore.
By
December 2013 $4 million had been received. But this will be reduced pretty
quickly as the program, if achieved is for 10 shipments per year.
One
advantage of running a bank account in the black all the time is that interest
is earned. By December 2013 $560,000 had been received, needed to pay the paper
shufflers to raise the funds in the first place.
But
the icing on the cake has been the R&D concessions payable to small
companies in cash rather than via a 150% tax deduction. A cash receipt up front
rather than a tax deduction when and if profits emerge.
It
does seem a little perverse that when direct outlays for science and research
are under extreme budgetary pressure, R&D subsidies are being paid to dig
up a bit of dirt and ship it overseas.
By
December 2013 $1.2 million had been received as R&D funding, coincidentally
roughly the same as remuneration paid to Directors.
Shree’s
shares are closely held by just a few. Currently
the punters only own about 25%.
The plan
Shree
has carried out exploration at a few sites in Tasmania. Only the Nelson Bay
River (NBR) project has survived.
The
NBR project has three types of resource: Direct shipping ore (DSO), beneficial
low-grade resource (BFO) and magnetite. The first two are basically dig and
ship operations with minimal processing required. They sit atop the third
resource which is similar to the Savage River mineral deposit and will require
more processing. To that end Shree has entered into a MOU with Grange Resources
operator of the Savage River mine which processes ore at Port Latta.
The
following chart sets out the plan, to sell 400,000 tonnes per year, that’s
about 10 shiploads, of the DSO stuff
until it’s exhausted after 2 years, then the BFO resource which will take after
another 2 years, then magnetite concentrate at the annual rate of 150,000 tonnes.
This
gives the mine a life of 10 years.
However
few believe the third stage will ever eventuate.
And
there are currently good odds available about Shree surviving the first 2 stages.
Most
outlays until June 2013 were for exploration. At some stage the capitalised
exploration expenses are written off if fruitless (about $1.2 million so far) or transferred to mine development
($6.2 million) and amortised once over the mine life.
Mining
started in November 2013.
The set-up
Where
possible the high risks of a mining operation such as Shree’s are shifted to
contractors. The following table details those, mainly locals, who have elected
to assume some of the risks.
Shree
itself doesn’t own much plant and equipment. At the end of 2011/12 there was only
2 computers on the balance sheet. There appears to be a little more plant
acquired since mining commenced but much of the necessary plant is probably
owned by contractors.
The costs
As
already indicated the first stage involves digging, minor on site processing,
transport to Burnie and shipping.
The
following table refers to estimated costs from one of Shree’s investor
presentations.
With
the absence of contracts, Shree is at the mercy of falling iron ore prices which
are now heading under US$100 per tonne. Many junior iron ore producers will
come under a lot of pressure. Rio can break even at US$40 per tonne (see HERE ).
Shree’s
breakeven point is likely to be higher than simply the costs of production, probably
at least US$100 per tonne.
But
in any event cash flow pressures can bring any business undone despite being in
a roughly break even cost of production situation.
Cash flow problems
There’s
always idle gossip in any community about who’s paying their bills and who’s
not.
Shree
gets a mention in the second category.
The
March 2014 quarterly report lodged with ASX at the end of April 2014 confirms problems
for Shree.
· Iron
ore grades are lower than expected
· Transportation
to the Burnie port is slower than forecast
· Iron
ore price fell sharply during the quarter
· The
$AUD appreciated during the quarter
· Ocean freight
rates are higher
During
the March quarter the first 2 boat loads were sold, 86,000 tonnes in total.
It
appeared as if cash for one load has been received, the first load sent with much
fanfare in January 2014. However that amount was only $3.7 million. Whether
Frost Global deducted anything before remitting to Shree is hard to ascertain.
Since
then iron ore prices have fallen further.
Shree
also disclosed a repayment of advances of $1.6 million to Frost Global in the
March quarter. Some of this is possibly reimbursement
of shipping costs probably about $800 k per load that Frost probably paid when
Shree couldn’t? The second load was sold
in the March quarter but money not yet received ( as at quarter’s end).It is doubtful
a ship’s captain would set sail for Burnie to take on a load of ore from a small
cash strapped West Coast miner without the money first being in his bank.
With
such demands on cash flow it is easy to accept that other creditor payments are
slow. Shree has disclosed in its quarterly reports that production costs are $5
million per quarter.
The
situation as per the half yearly accounts as at December 2012 showed things
were starting to look a little grim with payables of $2.3 million plus the $4
million owing to Frost Global.
The
March quarter payment of $1.6 million to Frost Global meant local suppliers and
contractors were probably shuffled further back in the creditor’s queue. At the
end of the March quarter only $2.3 million was owing to Frost Global. Totals due
to other creditors won’t be known until annual accounts are lodged in
September. Before then a June quarter cash flow report should be lodged by the
end of July.
With
Shree’s income dependent on ore grades at delivery point and spot iron ore
prices, there is always a long lead time and uncertainty between mining and
final payment which is why working capital is needed. Without it.....? Whether
the terms of Shree’s arrangement with Frost Global have changed has not been
revealed?
The
quarterly reports have also revealed waste stripping is greater than forecast.
Shree
has been silent on the matter of deferment of royalties offered by Ms Giddings
and Mr Green before their tenure was terminated. Such prima facie evidence of
Shree’s cash flow problems might well have been reported to ASX?
Luckily
mining punters are stoic souls. They’re accustomed to surprises.
The
private placement of $4 million in December 2013 was a life saving transfusion.
Over half was spent during the March quarter. But despite paying 16 cents per
share and raising more than the funds from the IPO of $3.5 million in February
2010, the share price has dropped sharply to the current offer price of 10.5
cents per share.
There
are more foxes in Tassie than Shree buyers.
What
will happen if more cash is needed?
Externalities
The
NBR project involves road transport of over 100 kms as per the map below, on
roads administered by the Circular Head Council, the government via DIER,
Forestry Tasmania and possibly Parks and Wildlife.
The
problem of road maintenance is fast becoming a game of bureaucratic handball
exacerbated by the absence of the only source of additional funds, the meagre
royalty payments. It will be interesting to see if a major spruiker of the
Shree venture, local member Mr Brooks will be able to use his diminishing
influence in government to obtain funds to fix roads, some now part of the new
Tarkine tourism drive, ill designed to handle trucks carrying 400,000 tonnes of
ore each year.
Where to?
For
junior miners to make it always requires a large dose of luck with all stars in
alignment, and ready sources of capital.
Shree
looks to be struggling on both counts.
Only
the super bulls thought the China boom would last 15 years+. The nagging
historical reality is that when commodity prices fall they may do so precipitously.
The
only real surprise is that the fall in prices, the so called terms of trade
effect has not flowed through to a fall in the $AUD exchange rate thereby
cushioning price falls.
By
all means let the punters have a go. But it’s difficult to imagine why the
community should subsidise such adventures.
Postscript
Monday 19th May
An
article in today’s Macrobusiness titled “The five waves that could wipe out the
Australian economy this year” included the following.
Wave four is the iron ore price and mining equities, which are
under intensifying pressure:
The iron ore market is very weak. Chinese steel production is
strong but end-user demand is not as Chinese property declines and inventories
of steel and iron ore are plentiful in China. That has led to a collapsing
steel price which will force Chinese steel mills to destock raw materials at
some point this year. The most likely candidate for that is Q3 on typical
seasonal weakness which looks like it may converge with China’s gathering
property bust.
If so, iron ore will fall to $80 or below in August or September
(before rebounding somewhat). That will mean all of the Budget’s estimated
terms of trade falls for next year will arrive instead in just one quarter.
Fortescue Metals, as well as a swag of junior iron ore miners, will face
another existential crisis.
Great commentary John, I enjoyed reading the in-depth analysis.
ReplyDelete