Tasmania's debt: Should we worry?

 

Viewing problems facing State governments through the same lens used to look at Federal budgets run the very real risk of erroneous conclusions.

The Australia Institute wrote an opinion piece titled Tasmania's fear of Government debt is hurting the State published in The Mercury on 22^nd March reassuring Tasmanians that deficit spending was fine because our assets are growing. “That does not sound like a government about to go broke“, it was said, ignoring the fact  insolvency isn’t triggered by a lack of assets, rather an inability to service liabilities.

There followed an assertion because our per capita net debt was lower than other States, despite other financial liabilities such as the much larger unfunded defined benefit scheme for government employees, Tasmania was sitting pretty. Our biggest challenge is to unshackle ourselves from a restrictive self-imposed borrowing constraint.

The pro-forma response to the Tony Abbott-Joe Hockey debt and deficit doomsday scenario was trotted out. Most economists agree with this knowing the Australian government is not revenue constrained and more significantly, controls its own currency, neither of which are true in the case of state governments.

The weeties choking moment came when it was stated: “Tasmania currently is able to meet its spending commitment to pay teachers, nurses and other public sector workers. The “cash flow” of the government is actually in surplus “.

That statement shows a complete misunderstanding of Tasmanian government financials. The suggestion that operating revenue is enough to cover operating spending is simply wrong.

This blog will pinpoint the errors whilst also having a look at the way State governments report their budget outcomes compared to the way the Federal government does.

Election 2024: Tas vs Vic - the battle for the Basket

 

Our less than honest politicians continue to rely on an endemic misunderstanding of State government debt when spruiking their credentials as economic managers.

Rebecca White harks back to 2014 when general government net debt was absent. But there was plenty of unfunded superannuation liabilities and borrowings by government businesses, some of which were needed to pay returns to government, that she conveniently sidestepped.

Jeremy Rockliff’s advertisements have a fleeting glimpse of a chart showing net debt across states with Tasmania having a small amount compared to other States. A disingenuous comparison given we’re the smallest State.

Treasurer Ferguson when defending the level of debt in his 2023/24 Budget the day after the budget was handed down in May 2023 told us our net debt is quite low:

 “…our borrowings are very, very small in comparison to other jurisdictions per capita, just have a look across the waters that Victoria what they are doing……..I wouldn’t want to be in their shoes.”

There’s plenty of metrics to suggest our predicament is not much different to Victoria, perhaps even worse given we are still deluding ourselves about our true position, and about to be lumbered with another round of unfunded election promises no matter who wins.

Election 2024: The Labor Fiscal strategy

 

Just when one thinks things can’t get any worse the Tasmanian Labor Party put out its Fiscal Strategy Statement with an accompanying media release declaring Treasurer Ferguson “simply has no idea what he’s doing.”

It’s a classic case of a kettle being called black by a particularly sooty pot.

The Fiscal Strategy is a statutory requirement of the Charter of Budget Responsibility Act 2007. Opposition parties need to lodge a Strategy with the Treasury Secretary ten days after an election is called.

The Tasmanian Labor Party outsourced the preparation of its fiscal strategy to its media minders. As a consequence, the strategy is a flawed document replete with dubious and at times incorrect assertions.