It’s been 13 years since the government
and Federal Hotels agreed to an extension of the original 1993 exclusive gaming
license covering table gaming, electronic gaming machines (EGMs) and Keno in
Tasmania.
Federal Hotels’ 2016 financial statements
lodged with ASIC last week revealed another $15 million paid as dividend to
shareholders. This takes the total to $199 million in 13 years, an average of
$15 million per year. The dividends represent 60 per cent of after tax profits,
an extraordinarily high payout ratio for a capital intensive tourism business.
These fully franked or tax paid dividends are equivalent to a before tax return
of $22 million per year.
The other party helping itself to the cash
tin was the bank whose borrowings were further reduced by $16.5 million. There
was a time when the reverse was true. From 2003 to 2011 bank borrowings
increased almost fourfold from $56 million to $200 million, but with the
gradual erosion of gambling revenue prompting a decline in net profits, the
banks obviously decided enough was enough. Since then borrowings have been
reduced to $123.5 million, all of which is now listed as a current liability.
This suggests borrowings are to be renegotiated during this current year.
Overall player losses from gaming have
been declining since 2009 due to fewer EGM losses. Keno has bucked the downward
trend. Its relative share of the gaming pie has almost doubled since 2004,
which combined with low tax rates has made Keno an important contributor to
Federal Hotel’s bottom line.
Federal Hotels’ opportunistic 2015 request
made in response to Mona’s David Walsh’s interest in a casino license, to
extend its sole license so that it could fund $100 million of upgrades to its
casinos and a new venue at Port Arthur that’s been on the drawing board for
years was a peerless display of chutzpah. After the 2003 extension/Saffire trade-off,
the Port Arthur project sounded like déjà vu all over again? And the need for
casino upgrades wouldn’t have anything to do with the decline in EGM revenue relative to
pubs and clubs coinciding with a decline in overall EGM turnover would it?
If funds are
needed to upgrade existing facilities they should be sourced from retained
earnings, borrowings or shareholder contributions just like every other
business. It shouldn’t require another special deal. This is not a start up
company that may require encouragement. This is a major player in a mature
industry competing with many others who aren’t given the same advantages.
It was fortunate Federal Hotels stashed a
little away following the sale of its regional tourism assets at Strahan,
Cradle Mountain and Freycinet in 2014, because much of it was needed to meet
the demands of both the bank and shareholders in 2016. But when it came time to
pay for the Newstead Hotel, the twelfth pub in Federal’s Vantage stable, all
ranked in the top 24 pokie performers across the state, Federal Hotels could
only come up with 20% of the purchase price from its own sources. A loan from a
third party of $8.6 million was needed. The bank must be a little wary with the
exclusive gaming license having a 2023 sunset clause?
With the abandonment of its regional
tourism strategy and the walkout from the West Coast Wilderness railway,
Federal Hotels has been long on promises, if the 2003 parliamentary inquiry
into the Deed extension is a guide, but short on delivery. The only new tourism
asset built since, is the mandated Saffire at Coles Bay. Other capital
additions have been existing businesses, either lucrative pokie pubs or
bottleshops. Even the impending, much trumpeted MACq 01 development is just a
fit out.
When Federal
Hotels operated its regional venues, advertising and promotion had the effect
of promoting tourism across the State. The original 1993 agreement required Federal Hotels
to spend at least $8 million a year promoting and marketing tourism. This
clause or one with similar intent is absent from the now operative 2003 Deed.
Even critics begrudgingly admit that Federal
Hotels’ advertisements had spill over benefits for the whole state. Whatever
was good for Federal Hotels was good for Tasmania. But its retreat from
regional Tasmania has left it back in the peloton hanging off David Walsh’s
coattails like everyone else in the Hobart accommodation business.
Any attempt to link EGMs and Keno with the
tourism industry should be resisted. For too long the tourism industry has
acquiesced to Federal Hotel’s dominant position in the industry because in part
there were spill over benefits. After 2011 however reality struck Federal
Hotels and its strategy changed with more emphasis on EGM pubs and less on
regional tourism. Acting as Federal Hotels’ praetorian guards as it plunders
the pockets of pokie players and secures a competitive advantage for itself
against others in the hospitality industry, is a bit much to behold, especially
when in the next breath, the industry makes further demands on government to
underwrite advertising across the entire industry and to fund AFL matches and
other major events.
It is sometimes forgotten that whilst
Federal Hotels dominates the electronic gaming scene in pubs there are another
six or so groups with multiple venues, who in total, together with Federal
Hotels own or run 90 percent of the top 50 EGM pubs. Any push to retain
existing privileges will be strongly resisted by this band that largely
operates on the periphery of the tourism industry, more in the broader
hospitality industry servicing Tasmanians. Will they all stick together or will
it be as in the case of the Lone Ranger and Tonto facing a hostile enemy when
the Lone Ranger said: “It looks like
we’re in a lot of trouble old friend”, to which Tonto replied “What do you mean ‘we’, Paleface?”
With the
expiry of current gaming arrangement in 2023 few will be able to argue they
haven’t achieved an adequate return on their gaming investments. There is no
need for the government to pander to anyone. Super profits from gaming could
have, for example, funded the State’s social housing backlog instead of ending
up in the pockets of a few. It’s an opportune time to change the landscape.
No comments:
Post a Comment